| 'No
corrupt judges here' 3
lawyers of different calibers vouch for 'clean' judicial system in Bohol
| | |
The issue of corruption
in the Court of Appeals which resulted in the sacking of one of its members while
four others were meted out with varying sanctions ranging from suspension to admonition
has caught the interest of three local lawyers of different calibers whose reactions
were sought on the state of the Bohol judiciary.
The
three attorneys-Victor de la Serna, Isabelo Sales, Jr. and Alexander Lim, were
picked from the hundreds of lawyers all over Bohol for their own commentaries
regarding the impact of the bribery scandal hounding the appellate court. |
But for
all their divergent reputation in the practice of law, all three lawyers were
unanimous in their pronouncement that the Bohol judiciary which is made up of
judges and prosecutors are generally free from corruption.
De
la Serna, a bar topnotcher, was chosen on the basis of his extensive knowledge
of the law considering the scope of his practice which expended from the US to
Manila and then Bohol. Among the three lawyers, only de la Serna can claim extensive
exposure to the practice of his calling because it expended beyond the Philippine
shores. He is a member of the California Bar.
Sales
was asked of his comment in his capacity as president of the Integrated Bar, Bohol
chapter.
For
his part, Lim was chosen from among his peers of competent lawyers, due to his
reputation as the most sought after lawyer hereabouts. It's public knowledge that
even if Lim is known to be one of the expensive legal counsels around, he is considered
the darling of litigants given his track record.
But
this Filipino-Chinese lawyer did not escape suspicion from among lawyers that
he is a popular law practitioner not because of his capability of handling cases
but his propensity to cultivate the right connections in the right places.
Although
he did not deny this wrong perception as claimed by members of the local Bar,
Lim said if he is the favorite of litigants compared to other lawyers it is because
he knows the law.
But
Lim denied the insinuation that he won cases not because on its merits but because
he knows the judges and fiscals.
He
took exception to the widely known dictum among lawyers. This saying which Lim
denied to have enjoyed was the one that differentiates between a good lawyer and
a great lawyer. It says a good lawyer knows his law while a great lawyer knows
the judge.
While
admitting that he was a victim of the unsavory perception, Lim maintained that
out of professional jealousy some people have the wrong notion that he won cases
because he knows the judge.
An
Ateneo graduate, Lim said on the whole, judges and fiscals in Bohol are basically
honest.
Although
he mentioned of a few recalcitrant magistrates and prosecutors, those who were
involved in improprieties were isolated cases. He did not elaborate.
DE
LA SERNA
On
the part of de la Serna, he said the recent bribery scandal that has shattered
the public image and credibility of the Court of Appeals has only confirmed the
malignant cancer that has infected the country's judicial system for so long a
time now.
The
topnotcher lawyer apparently knew whereof he spoke.
A
long time practicing lawyer in the nation's capital, de la Serna can rattle off
the corrupt judges in the CA and the regional trial courts in Metro Manila.
He
said it is common knowledge among Manila-based lawyers who are the so-called runners
and brokers of CA and RTC judges in Manila.
He,
however, took exception to insinuations that some local judges and prosecutors
are tainted with corruption charges.
He
said that in Bohol, there's no way that judges and ficals will have the temerity
to fix cases knowing this is one place where everybody knows everybody.
At
the first sign that a judge was perceived to be corruptible, the issue will immediately
spread and the erring magistrate will not escape the curse and wrath of a vigilant
public.
Going
back to his thesis on corrupt CA justices, de la Serna said while corruption by
many judges and justices was spoken more in whispers among lawyers before, this
incident has blown wide open judicial corruption to the general public.
The
Supreme Court acting on the recommendation of a three-man panel it created handed
the penalty of dismissal from the service of Justice Vicente Roxas. The reason
cited was his undue interest in handling the Meralco vs GSIS which resulted in
his favorable decision to the giant power utility company.
The
High Court also suspended for two months Justice Jose Sabio, Jr. while three others
were handed varying sanctions ranging from reprimand to admonition for their involvement
in the controversial case.
IBP
PREXY POSITION
Reacting
to the fate that befall the five justices, the IBP-Bohol followed the line espoused
by its national chapter. Calling for drastic action, the IBP national chapter
through its president called for the resignation of all the justices involved.
The
full text of the IBP-Bohol statement read:
The
position of the IBP national board of governors was for the appellate justices
involved in the MERALCO - GSIS controversy to resign from their posts.
From
our view, we find no cogent reason to offer dissent to their stand. Obviously,
with all the corruption and misdeeds happening in highest places of government,
the only remaining bastion of integrity and trust is in our courts. Once
this is lost, we can no longer expect fairness and justice even in our courts
of law.
Certainly,
the rule of the mob is not quite far behind absent the respect for the law. |